By Karim El-Bar
LONDON (AA) – A coalition of opposition politicians are taking legal action against British Prime Minister Boris Johnson for failing to investigate alleged Russian interference in UK politics, local media reported on Thursday.
It is reportedly the first time a British government is being taken to court for national security failings, with the opposition politicians saying its failure to ensure elections were fair and free from outside interference was a breach of Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
They also want to force Johnson to implement an “adequate legislative framework to protect against future foreign interference.”
It has been four months since the release of the chronically delayed Russia report compiled by parliament, which found “credible evidence” that Moscow had targeted British elections.
Britain was “clearly a target for Russia’s disinformation campaigns and political influence operations,” and as such “must therefore equip itself to counter such efforts".
The politicians launching the judicial review against Johnson are: Alyn Smith MP (SNP), Ben Bradshaw MP and Chris Bryant MP (Labour), and Caroline Lucas MP (Greens) from the lower House of Commons, as well as Lord Strasburger (Liberal Democrat) and Baroness Wheatcroft (former Conservative) from the upper House of Lords.
Baroness Wheatcroft said: “Free and fair elections are a cornerstone of any democracy. There is no doubt that the internet has opened the way for widespread potential interference in the electoral process from malign forces and that Russia has tried to exploit that opportunity.
“The Government must do its best to protect our electoral system and it can only begin to do that effectively if it first investigates the nature and scale of the problem. It is shameful that it refuses to do that voluntarily but that refusal is why I am party to this action to try and compel the action that the country deserves,” she added.
The judicial review also scored a witness review from Lord Ricketts -- a former chair of the Joint Intelligence Committee and the first ever National Security Adviser to the British government.
He said he was surprised that “the government appeared not to have sought evidence on whether the Russian state was successful in interfering in the 2016 EU referendum campaign, and neither had it made any post-referendum assessment of Russian attempts to influence elections in the UK.”
“Given the importance of knowing the extent of past Russian interference in assessing the risk for future elections, I do not understand why the Government would choose not to investigate,” he said, adding that there was a “failure to give political direction” to the security services.
The judicial review is also being backed by The Citizens, a not-for-profit organization.
Their spokesperson said: “It is completely extraordinary that the UK government should have so little concern for the national security of the country, that a cross-party group of MPs and Peers feels it has no choice but to take legal action in this way.
“As far as we know, it is unprecedented in modern British history. In the US, multiple investigations involving hundreds of intelligence officers and Congressional inquiries have detailed the extensive attacks by Russia on the 2016 US election.
“In Britain, that process hasn't even begun. We hope this will be the beginning of the beginning of that process.”
A UK government spokesman refused to comment directly on the legal proceedings, but did say: “Safeguarding our democracy will always be an absolute priority and the UK has robust systems in place to protect our elections and institutions from interference.
“To prevent against any future threats we are bringing forward new legislation to provide the security services and law enforcement agencies with the tools they need to disrupt hostile state activity.
“And we have also published proposals for a digital imprint regime that will improve transparency in political campaigning online, and are developing an online media literacy strategy to help empower the public to question the information they read online.”
- Marketplace blasts kill 14 in central Afghanistan
- Quarantine for travelers to England to be cut to 5 days
- Spain unveils coronavirus vaccination plan
- Turkish Treasury borrows $703M through auctions
- Majority of Republicans to vote for Trump in 2024: Poll
- Women continue to live in fear of abuse in South Africa
- B-Ball: American point guard Berry II joins Besiktas
- Terror attack kills 1 in Afrin, northwestern Syria
- Coronavirus tally soars in Arab countries
- Turkey: Preschool teachers prefer in-person education
- Japan, China discuss disputed islands
- Turkey: Member of presidential advisory board resigns
- India bans 43 apps over defense, security concerns
- Sudan draws plan to tackle Ethiopian refugees
- Denmark sets new high in daily COVID-19 cases
UK politicians sue government over Russia interference
Opposition politicians say prime minister's failure to ensure elections were free and fair breached human rights
This news is a total 16 time has been read
Japan, China discuss disputed islandsChinese foreign minister holds talks with Japanese counterpart in Tokyo amid tensions in region
Turkey: Member of presidential advisory board resigns'I submitted my request to resign from my duty as member of board to our President and he accepted it,' says Bulent Arinc
Turkey: Party leader condemns search of Turkish shipGermany's search of private Turkish-flagged ship is 'banditry,' 'immoral scheme,' says opposition MHP chief Devlet Bahceli
Turkish main opposition condemns Germany, Italy over search of shipHis remarks come in wake of contraversial search of Turkish-flagged ship by EU naval mission
Trump says authorizing transition work not concessionUS president says he will 'never concede to fake ballots & Dominion' voting systems